Environment of Earth

December 23, 2008

EFFECTS OF ACID RAINS, ACID FOG AND ACID MIST

Filed under: Acid rain, Air pollution, Environment — gargpk @ 3:28 pm

Acid rains, acid fog and acid mist cause quite serious damages to natural and man-made things. These damages may be studied under following categories:

Effects on materials, buildings and man-made objects

The chemical weathering and corrosive processes of materials like coated and uncoated carbon steel, painted steel, galvanized steel, nickel-plated steel, iron, copper, nickel and other metals exposed to rains, fog and mist of acidic pH is speeded in various ways. Ferrous metals are particularly attacked by oxides of sulphur. The iron rusts, its surface becomes flaky and flakes fall off to expose more metal thus resulting in continued corrosion. As a consequence, the ion in the buildings, vehicles, railway stock and tracks, electrical and telecommunication installations etc. suffer badly. In areas having acidic rains, fog and mist, corrosion of zinc products may be ten times faster than in clean areas. Acid rain and mist also damage paint coatings and thus expose the underlying material for further damage. Acidification of surface and groundwater in the affected areas results in corrosion of submerged structures and thus submerged parts of bridges, dams, industrial equipment, water storage tanks and hydro-electric turbines are seriously damaged.

All types of buildings, especially those built of sandstone, limestone and marble are seriously damaged and their rate of decay in affected areas is often 2-3 times higher than in unaffected areas. Both stone and the mortar of buildings is affected by acid rains.

Limestone buildings are worst affected due to reaction of sulphur with calcium carbonate in presence of moisture forming calcium sulphate which is soluble and is washed away with rainwater. Soluble sulphates, nitrates, chlorides and other salts being washed over the surface of stonework crystallize within the stone when the surface water evaporates. The expansion of such salts during crystallization enlarges the cracks leading to crumbling (exfoliation) of stone surface. This, in turn, further exposes the fresh underlying stone to chemical corrosion by acid rains. Cement that has high lime content is seriously affected by acid rains while sandstone which has high silica content, is comparatively less damaged. Main visible effect of acid rains on sandstone is formation of hard, black surface coating on the exposed surface. Granite, light-coloured stones and bricks become darkened and black in acid rains. Brick-built structures are less vulnerable than stone-built structures and for this reason, historical monuments, buildings and sculptors which are mostly made up of stone and marble, are seriously damaged by acid rains. In India, acid rain damage is markedly evident on Taj Mahel of Agra, Red For and Jama Masjid of Delhi.

Continuous etching and washing away of the exterior surface of stained or unstained glass exposed to acid rains reduces the glass thickness and thus glass windows of most of most of the historical buildings in Europe are being damaged.

Effect on human health

Though wet acid deposition by acid rains has no direct effect on human health, it indirectly affects human beings. These indirect effects are not directly due to acid rain itself but are due to toxic heavy metals released by it in the environment. Acidification of soils results in release of heavy metals like Cu, Zn, Cd and Hg in the soil. These metals leach down to ground water and/or are washed down to rivers and lakes. The terrestrial plants absorb these metals from soil and aquatic plants from water. These metals thus enter the natural food chain and are passed on successively to higher trophic levels ultimately reaching human beings as plant or animal food. Human body accumulates these heavy metals over long periods of time and their concentration in human body may reach toxic levels causing various diseases. High heavy metal concentrations are known to cause osteomalacia (an uncommon bone disease)in adults and diorrhoea in babies.

Effects on freshwater aquatic flora and fauna

Dry and wet acid deposition over freshwater bodies like rivers and lakes results in serious damage to flora and fauna of these surface water bodies mainly in the following ways:

  1. Reduction in water pH: In areas subjected to dry and wet acid deposition, unbuffered or poorly buffered surface freshwater bodies become acidified resulting in significant changes in its ecology. Critical pH level for most of the aquatic plant or animal species is 6.0. However, pH tolerance range varies amongst species as well as at different stages in the life cycle of the individuals of a species. The species that can tolerate and survive in quite wide range of pH values of water are termed tolerant species while species that can survive only within a very narrow range of water pH are termed sensitive species. Due to such differential pH sensitivity of different species and different age groups of same species, acidification of water results in marked changes in species composition, age structure and biodiversity of freshwater aquatic habitat.

    1. Change in species composition: In freshwater bodies of normal pH, a large number of species are normally present. With increasing acidity of aquatic habitat, the species more sensitive to low pH i.e. sensitive species begin to be eliminated from the area and tolerant species are left. Gradually the acidity-sensitive species become extinct and tolerant species occupy the habitat in their place. Thus the species composition of the freshwater habitat changes due to increased acidity. For example, among animal species, many acid-sensitive species of amphibians( e.g. frogs, toads), fishes (salmon, roach and minow etc.), snails etc. become extinct and tolerant species of Hemiptera and Heteroptera (e.g. water bugs) and Corixidae (water boatman) which can survive down to a pH of 3.4, survive and expand. Among phytoplankton, most of the species of green algae, diatoms and small floating hydrophytes disappear below the pH of 5.8. Diatom species have extremely species specific narrow pH tolerance ranges and the species composition of diatoms in freshwater bodies changes very rapidly in response to pH changes of the water.

    2. Reduction in biodiversity and food-web complexity: Most of the species of plants and animals found in freshwater ecosystem are acid-sensitive and very few of them acid-tolerant. With increasing acidification of water body, acid-sensitive species disappear and acid-tolerant species survive and spread. This results in highly reduced biodiversity in acidified freshwater bodies. Generally, the population sizes and then the number of species of angiosperm hydrophytes, algae, zooplankton, aquatic insects and fishes gradually decrease with increasing acidification of water body. The number of phytoplankton and snail species declines below pH of 5.5. Snail species completely disappear below pH of 5.2; zooplankton disappears below pH of 5.0 and fish species rapidly disappear below pH of 4.0. Though acidification affects of the animal species, impact on fish populations is quite dramatic. Many acidified lakes on Ontario in Canada have become totally fish-less while in many of the lakes, trout, wall-eye, burbot and small-mouth bass have disappeared. Many lakes above 610 meters altitude with pH below 6.0 in northeast U.S.A. have also become totally fish-less. Upto 20.000 acidified lakes in Sweden have been affected in varying degrees. About 9,000 lakes in southern Sweden and 1,400 lakes in southern Norway have few fish species left in them with roach, arctic char, trout and perch having disappeared following acidification of lakes. Generally, size and diversity of fish populations shows progressive decline below the pH of 6.0. Mass death of fish populations may also occur in lakes and rivers following acid surges induced by melting of acidified snow in upstream areas during spring season. As a result of the decrease in number of species, the complexity of food webs also decreases and the food webs gradually become simplified in acidified freshwater ecosystems.

    3. Change in age structure and population dynamics: Breadth of pH tolerance range varies between different stages of the individuals of the same species. Young and old members of a species are often more sensitive to low pH and, therefore, they disappear more rapidly than middle-aged individuals. For example, among animals, fishes and amphibians are especially sensitive to acidity during their early embryonic stages. Thus in acidified freshwater bodies, the number of young and old individuals of the species which can tolerate acidity to some extent, gradually declines and the number of middle-aged adults gradually increases. This alters the age structure of acid-tolerant species in fresh-water ecosystems. For example, progressive decline in frog population has been reported from many acidified Swedish lakes due to inhibition of egg-hatching and death of tadpoles. Stocks of salmon have considerably declined in many acidified lakes and rivers of south and southeast Norway and western coast of Sweden. The effects of acidification on the fishes are extremely rapid. However, in low levels of acidification, older fishes survive and grow bigger in size due to reduced competition for food as a result of rapid death of younger ones, This short-term increase in fish biomass is really a signal of the imminent decline of the population due to decline in its reproductive capacity. Thus change in age structure ultimately results in changes in the population dynamics of the species ultimately leading to adverse results.

    4. Change in rate of mineral cycling: The species of rooted hydrophytes being highly acid-sensitive, disappear while filamentous algae and moss Sphagnum being acid-tolerant, colonize the bed of acidified freshwater bodies. Fungi and bacteria that play important role in decomposition of dead organic matter are not acid-tolerant and, therefore, tend to disappear below pH of 5.5. The growth of acid-tolerant filamentous algae and moss in acidified freshwater bodies seals off the oxygen input and slows the decomposition of organic matter on the lake floors. This coupled with absence of decomposing bacteria and fungi results in very much reduced rate of decomposition of organic matter and its accumulation at the bottom of freashwater body. Thus valuable mineral nutrients become trapped in the undecomposed organic matter instead of being released again into the ecosystem by decomposition.

  2. Increase in toxic metal ion concentration: A very damaging effect of acid rains is increase in the concentrations of heavy metals like Al, Cd, Hg, Mn, Fe and Zn in surface freshwater bodies. Acid deposition on soil and rocks in the catchement areas makes these metals in soils and rocks more soluble and mobile. Thus these released heavy metals are washed down to lakes, rivers and other surface freshwater bodies alongwith runoff water. Acidification of water bodies also mobilizes these metals from the beds into the water. These heavy metals are highly toxic to plants and animals. The metals are first taken up by aquatic plants, accumulated in their bodies and then passed on to higher trophic levels via food chains. At each level in the food chain, the concentration of toxic heavy metals increases due to their accumulation in the animal bodies over time (bio-magnification). When concentration of any metal crosses the critical threshold tolerance value in the body of an organism, it becomes toxic to that organism. Accumulation of toxic levels of metals in animal body has been show to be an important factor in reduction of population size of many aquatic species as well as predatory animals living close to water bodies.

    1. In high concentration, Aluminium can become complexed with phosphates in the water which are often the critical limiting factors in aquatic ecosystems because they are essential nutrients for phytoplankton and hydrophytes. Reduction in phosphate leads to reduced primary production in the freshwater ecosystem. This ultimately results in progressive decrease in the food supply and, therefore, decline in population sizes of consumer animal species in higher trophic levels.

    2. Birds like flycatchers nesting on the shores of acidic lakes eat Al-laden fish and end up with its high concentration in their bodies. Due to high Al-concentration, they produce eggs with soft or no shells and, therefore, only few eggs hatch successfully leading to decline in their population sizes. Aluminium is acutely toxic to fish at pH levels that are not normally harmful. Its concentration as low as 0.2 mg per liter kills the fishes. Though Al-poisoning interferes with normal reproduction of fishes, its more damaging effect is on the gills. Precipitation of Aluminium on the gills interferes with transport of oxygen and ions (e.g. Na+ and Cd2+) across gill membrane. Much mucus is excuded to combat the Aluminium collected on the gills which further inhibits uptake of oxygen and salts in gills. Disturbance of ionic regulation affects transport of gases between respiratory organs and the body tissues. This alongwith inhibition of oxygen-uptake, causes respiratory stress leading ultimately to death. Accumulation of Hg, Cd and Zn has also been shown to cause damage in various aquatic animal species.

Effects on terrestrial ecosystems

Acid deposition on land affects the forests and crops directly as well as indirectly through alteration of the chemistry and microbiology of soil. Though effects of acid deposition on crops have important economic consequences, the effects on forests have been very dramatic and ecologically damaging. However, the study of the effects of acid deposition on land is a very complex problem because of the following two factors:

  1. There is a very wide range and large number of possible interactions between atmosphere, soil and plants in terrestrial ecosystems.

  2. Effects of acid deposition on soil and vegetation take very long time (decades in case of trees) to reach detectable levels.

Despite the constraints mentioned above, studies have yielded much information about the effects of acid rains on various aspects of terrestrial ecosystems. These may be categorized as following:

Effects on soil chemistry: Following acid deposition, a series of complex chemical reactions take place in the soil. General consequences of these reactions are:

  1. Increasing nutrient deficiency in the soil: In the acidified soil, basic cations are replaced by hydrogen and aluminium ions. These liberated cations are rapidly leached down and out of the soil solution alongwith sulphate from the acid input. Basic cations are essential plant nutrients, particularly the K+, Na+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ which are taken up by plants from the soil in quite large amounts (macronutrients). Loss of essential nutrient cations from the soil adversely affects the plant growth. Poorly buffered soils are highly susceptible to acid-induced nutrient deficiency e.g. soils of Swedish forests have shown progressively decreasing levels of K+, Na+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ over a ten-year period of acid deposition. Replacement of nutrient cations by hydrogen and aluminium ions further increases the soil acidity. Setting up a vicious cycle.

  2. Mobilization and increase in heavy metal content of soil: Increase in soil acidity is often associated with increased soil concentration of toxic heavy metals. Most common such heavy metals are Al, Cd, Mn, Hg, Pb, Fe and Zn. In the soil of normal pH, these metals remain chemically ‘bound up’ in the soil. However, acidic pH of soil frees these metals and the mobilized metals can now rapidly spread throughout the soil alongwith natural flow of soil water.

  3. Damage to mineral structure of soil: Soil acidification also increases the weathering of silicate minerals during liberation of metals and thus causes loss of mineral structure of the soil.

Effects on soil microbes: Acid deposition on land results in acidification of soil which causes damage to various decomposing bacterial and fungal populations in the soil. As a result, rate of decomposition of organic matter is slowed down and, therefore, the nutrient recycling in the ecosystem is blocked. Since return of essential nutrients back to the soil is blocked, the soil progressively becomes impoverished. Experimental studies have shown that soil acidity strongly reduces the decomposition of the litter of pine, spruce, birch and other cellulose-rich materials. Such reduction in decomposition of organic matter also results in reduced respiration of soil microbes including nitrogen-fixing bacteria and blue-green algae. This increases the levels of ammonia in the soil due to reduced mobilization of nutrients previously released by decomposition and the soil nitrate levels are considerably reduced due to ammonification. Such changes in the soil having pH below 3.0 bring about marked changes in the population sizes and species composition of soil microbes. For example, total abundance of acid-sensitive enchytraeids decreases and that of tolerant springtails increases. Further, soil acidification causes significant damage to other soil fauna also, particularly the earthworms. Reduced earthworm population markedly alters the soil structure and consequently the soil productivity is reduced.

Effects on terrestrial plants and ecosystem:

Effects on higher plants

All types of plants are adversely affected by acid rain and the damage is caused in two ways; firstly through shoot system, particularly the foliage which are directly exposed to acid rain, acid fog or acid mist and secondly through root system via deficiency of soil nutrients and toxicity of heavy metals in the acidified soil. Visible symptoms in plants can assume various forms depending on the character and level of acid deposition and the buffer capacity of the soil. The symptoms also vary between species and with the age of plant and tissue. Younger tissues and young plants are generally more susceptible to acid rain damage. In general, acid rain damage in plants is manifested as reduced plant growth and hence decline in yields, reduced canopy cover, reduced reproductive capacity etc.

  1. Increased susceptibility to pathogens: Acid rains damage the surface cuticle of leaves and other plant organs and thereby make the plant more susceptible to attack by pathogenic fungi and bacteria which can now enter through the damaged surface.

  2. Reduced growth: As discussed above, increasing soil acidity result in decreased availability of essential plant nutrients in the soil due to decreased nutrient cycling. Further, high aluminium released in soil following soil acidification has been reported to damage root hairs and thus adversely affect nutrient uptake. As a result of these, plants growing in land areas affected by acid deposition generally show poor growth. The availability of nutrients to the trees and other plants is also influenced by the exchange processes that take place on the surface of leaves. Ammonia and nitrogen landing on the leaf surface via acid deposition pass through the semi-permeable membranes of epidermal cells of leaves and are incorporated into the leaf tissue. This results in cation exchange in leaf tissues and the abundant plant nutrients present in leaf tissues such as K, Ca, Mg and S are leached and washed off the leaf surface. This foliar leaching due to acid deposition also causes depletion of essential plant nutrients and, therefore, reduced plant growth.

  3. Foliar injury: Various visible leaf injury symptoms develop in leaves of plants growing in areas affected by acid rains. In general, visible leaf injury symptoms depend on the density of trichomes and stomata. Due to plasmolysis of palisade cells in leaves, structural damage in chloroplasts are common. In leaves of several species galls are produced in response to acid deposition.

  4. Reduction in symbiotic balances: In the plants growing in land areas affected by acid deposition, formation of root nodules is drastically reduced and other symbiotic associations like ectotrophic and endotrophic mycorrhizae are also adversely affected.

  5. Reduction in reproductive capacity: Decrease in flowering, reduced pollen germination, inhibition of pollen tube growth and inhibition of seed germination has been reported due to acid rains. In Norway spruce, Scots pine and Silver birth, seed germination is inhibited between pH 3.8 and 5.4. In these plants initial establishment of seedling is highly sensitive to soil pH and rapidly decreases below pH 4.2. All these effects of acid rains ultimately result in reduced reproductive success of the affected plants and, therefore, in reduced population size of the affected sensitive species. With gradual decrease in reproductive potential of affected species, the tolerant species gain upper hand and due to better reproductive success, gradually spread in the area.

Effects on lichens, algae and bryophytes

The lichens, algae and bryophytes growing on or in the soil in the areas affected by acid rains are also affected severely. Lichens drive their nutrients from the minerals falling on them with rainwater. Therefore, acid rain reduces the the availability of nutrients to lichens to a far greater extent than other plants. Rate of assimilation of nutrients in lichen thallus also varies with pH of rainwater. Further different species of lichens and bryophytic plants show different tolerance levels of rainwater acidity. Sensitive species are generally eliminated very early in the areas affected by acid rains and such areas become dominated by tolerant species of lichens and bryophytes. Thus acid rains alter the population abundance, species composition and diversity of lichen and bryophytic flora.

Effects on forests:

Damage to forests due to acid rains is a complex problem. The available evidence suggests that the damage is caused due to a combination of a variety of contributory factors in addition to acid deposition. Such factors include dry deposition of the oxides of sulphur and nitrogen, ozone, heavy metal content of soil, parasites and plant diseases, extreme climatic conditions like very high or very low rainfall and temperature extremes (particularly frost), site factors e.g. soil drainage, soil characteristics, general state of health and age of trees, surge of naturally produced acids, acid flushes (e.g. during spring snow-melt or after prolonged draught) and forest management practices. Such factors also contribute to damages to crops caused by acid rains. Ozone has been found to increase the vulnerability of trees to acid-induced damage by increasing their susceptibility to poisoning and nutrient loss. Ozone might play significant role at high altitudes where sunshine required for photo-chemical production of ozone is more intense. Vegetation above 10,000 ft. line in West Germany shows many damaged trees. Much of the damage to vegetation remains undetected until it reaches a critical, perhaps irreversible stage. Species of coniferous and deciduous trees generally exhibit much genetic variability in their populations due to which all the individuals of a species do not show equal sensitivity to acid rains. Such variability is particularly marked in Scots pine and Norway spruce. Further, different species in a forest have different dose-response relationship. All these factors make generalizations about the acid-rain induced damage to forests quite different. However, most evident effects of acid rains on forests have been observed in the form of Crown-dieback and Waldsterben.

  1. Crown-dieback: In forest systems, damage to trees which is most extensive in West Germany, is spreading alarmingly throughout Europe and is gradually building up in U.S.A. and Canada. Visible damage tends to be concentrated in older and established trees and appears to be species-specific. Scots pine is the most sensitive species in which needles become shorter, duration of needles on the tree decreases from three to one year, top buds dry, annual growth of shoot decreases and shape of crown changes. Damaged conifers, in general, show yellowing of needles, loss of needles, distortion of branches, thinning of tree tops, injuries in bark, changes in trunks and damage to fine roots. In deciduous trees, main symptoms include discolouration of deformation of leaves, early shedding of leaves, bark injuries, death of tree tops and lack of natural regeneration. In extreme condition of damage, tree tops in all types of trees die earlier than the branches further downwards. This condition has been termed crown die-back.

  2. Waldsterben: In 1980s, German scientists first observed the wasting disease of trees attributed to acid rains and termed it waldsterben which literally means ‘death of trees’ or ‘dying tree syndrome’ that blighted trees and forests. The extent and rate of spread of such damage is quite alarming in industrialized countries. By 1985 about 52% forest area was affected in West Germany and about 86% of woodland in East Germany showed such damage. The damage has also been found in forest of France, Switzerland, Sweden, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Czechoslowakia, Russia, U.K. Canada and U.S.A. Tree death occurs within five weeks of the appearance of first symptoms. Further, waldsterben affects young saplings as well as mature trees. In forests of areas affected by acid rains, first signs of damage were reported in Abies alba in early 1970s and in Picea abies by late 1970s. Pinus sylvestris and Fagus sylvetica were affected by early 1980s and the damage spread to other species like larch, red oak, maple, ash and rowan showing that disease affects almost all tree species. Greatest absolute damage was found in spruce and greatest relative damage occurred in silver fir in which over 87% of the trees were damaged. Three stages have been identified in this damage process:

  1. Nitrates or nitrogen oxide in the acid rain initially provide soil nutrients and the trees grow more rapidly.

  2. In next stage, soil progressively loses the ability to neutralize the increased acidity and the acids begin to accumulate and cause leaching of nutrient cations leading to slowing down of tree growth and yellowing or discolouration of needles or leaves. Sulphate combines with metals in soil and increases heavy metal concentration in the soil.

  3. In the last stage, toxic aluminium is released at pH 4.2 leading to destruction of tree roots and deterioration of natural defense mechanisms of trees that prevent the entry of pathogenic bacteria, fungi and viruses. The trees thus gradually die due to nutrient deficiency, heavy metal toxicity and various pathogenic diseases.

Effects on ecosystem

Among terrestrial plants, the sequence of the sensitivity to acid rains is herbaceous dicots> woody dicots>monocots>conifers. The acid rain induced damage to trees, which are most important primary produces in the terrestrial ecosystems, reduces the food availability to animals in higher trophic levels. As a result, the population sizes of various animal species is adversely affected. In general, acid rains result in changes in relative abundance of populations in all the trophic levels and also the reduced species diversity of terrestrial ecosystems. In all the trophic levels, sensitive species are gradually eliminated and are replaced by tolerant species.

Acid rain

Filed under: Acid rain, Air pollution, Atmospheric chemistry, Environment — gargpk @ 3:25 pm

 The natural rainwater moving through atmosphere comes in contact with various chemicals produced and deposited in the atmosphere. These chemicals are produced by various natural (e.g. electrical nitrogen fixation due to electrical lightening), biological (e.g. release of gases in decay and decomposition of organic matter and other biological processes) and geological (e.g. volcanic eruptions and weathering of rocks) processes. Due to this contamination, natural rainwater in perfectly unpolluted areas is also somewhat acidic. The pH of normally clean or ‘pristine’ rainwater is generally agreed by scientists to be 5.6.If rainwater falling in an area has pH value below 5.6, it is called acid rain.

Recent measurements show that rain and snow having pH 4.3 or below fall regularly over many areas of heavily industrialized Northern hemisphere, specially North America, northern and western Europe. Sometimes individual storms under favourable conditions may have may have very low pH values. For example, in 1979, Kane in Pennsylvania, America recorded a rain of pH 2.7 and in same year, , Wheeling in West Virginia had rain of pH 1.5. In Britain, Pitlochry had a rainfall of pH 2.4 in 1974. The acid rains is caused by emission of large quantities of sulphur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen in the atmosphere due to burning of fossil fuel in various industrial and other activities of human beings. Allied to acid rains are phenomena of acid mist and acid fog, both of which come under the category of occult precipitation. The cause of acid mist or acid fog is high concentration of sulphates and nitrates in the form of fine aerosol particles (dust or soot) in wind-driven ground-level clouds which causes condensation of tiny water droplets around these particles. These droplets being tiny fraction of normal rain drops, do not fall as rain water but remain suspended in the atmosphere forming acid mist or acid fog.

The problem of acid rain has attracted worldwide attention only since 1980s. However, the term ‘acid rain’ was first used by first Alkali Inspector of Britain,, Robert Angus in 1872. His work largely remained ignored until 1950s when Canadian ecologist Dr. Eville Gorham undertook detailed studies of rainwater quality and its control in Lake District in north-west England. By mid 1960s, early damage symptoms of acid rains begun to appear in Scandinavia and Swedish worker Svente Oden begain a concerted scientific effort in 1967 to bring awareness about acid rain problem. He is considered to be the father of modern acid rain studies.

GEOGRAPHY OF ACID RAIN

Primary pollutants causing acid rain problem are blown over long distances by the wind and thus spreading the problem over whole of the Earth’s surface. However, till now most of pollutants responsible for acid rain problem are produced in the highly industrialized nations, the areas of the impact of acid rains are few, noticeable, few and predictable. Common properties observed in areas affected seriously by acid rain problem are:

  1. Heavy concentration of industries producing pollutants responsible for acid rain problem.

  2. Downwards flow of winds from pollutant-producing areas.

  3. Upland-mountainous position of pollutant-producing areas having thin glaciated bedrock and high rainfall-snowfall.

  4. Numerous lakes and streams and rich forest cover in pollutant-producing area.

Areas sharing the above common properties are termed acid rain hot spots and include many parts of Scandinavia, upland Britain, West Germany and many parts of Northern Europe. Across Atlantic, such areas include Nova Scotia, Canadian Shield around southern Ontario and Quebec, Adriaondack Mountains, Great Smoky Mountains, parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota, Pacific Northwest U.S.A., Colorado Rockies and Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Japanese islands are also included in this category.

In contrast to above areas, there are two types of safe areas where acid rains are not a problem at present. These areas include:

  1. The areas located away from and not downwind of possible source areas and themselves having little polluting industrialization. These areas include almost all of southern hemisphere, tropics and parts of northern hemisphere e.g. northern Russia.

  2. The areas that receive acid rains but have natural resistance to its damaging impact due to buffering capacity provided by the alkaline dust blown from the west. Actually alkaline rains have been reported in Sweden before 1960 in areas with limestone outcrops and cement manufacturing areas. Wind blown alkaline material can de derived from deserts (fine material brought over from Sahara and Gobi deserts has been reported), from wind erosion of top soil alkaline particulate pollutants e.g. soot from smoke-emitting chimneys and agricultural fertilizers.

Geologically, the areas most vulnerable to acid rains fall under three categories:

  1. Glacial areas on granite and other highly siliceous bedrock e.g. quartzite, quartz sandstone, certain gneisses and on materials derived from these.

  2. Areas with thick deposits of siliceous sands e.g. sand plains of Denmark and Netherlands.

  3. Areas with relatively old, highly weathered and leached soils.

Areas having severest acid rain damage are glaciated Pre-Cambrian shield areas of Scandinavia, glaciated parts of upland Britain having thin soils, eastern Canada and resistant Canadian Shield and northwest U.S.A. Problems of acidification develop much acutely on granite and similar other resistant rocks.

Acid rain as global problem

Though at present acid rain problem is mainly concentrated in highly industrialized areas, the long-range transport of concerned air pollutants results in gradual globalization of the problem. As a result of slow transport of acid rain causing pollutants from heavily industrialized areas to areas till now free from this problem, the latter areas are also beginning to show acidification damage. Such damage has been reported from many developing nations like Zambia, South Africa, Malaysia, Venezuela, India and China. Most productive farmlands of China and India, paddy fields of South-east Asia and forests of Amazon in South America have soils which are highly susceptible to acidification.

Global dimension of acid rain problem was established beyond doubt in 1981 with discovery of Arctic haze. It is bluish-gray haze developing in Arctic areas similar to that frequently found over and downwind of large industrial areas in western Europe and eastern North America. Haze layers often cover a horizontal area of upto 1000 km and are caused by scattering of solar radiation by minute suspended particles in the atmosphere. These particles vary in the size range of 0.1-1.0 micrometer and mostly comprise of sulphate aerosols. These aerosols are transported by jet streams in upper atmosphere and may reach upto 8000 km away from their industrial sources. Hazes are found to be thickest in Alaska’s North Slope extending atleast to Norway. Hazes mainly affect visibility and are not as damaging as the smog.

CAUSE AND FORMATION OF ACID RAIN

SO2 and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emitted into the atmosphere due to industrial, commercial and other anthropogenic activities are the basic cause of acid rain formation. Therefore, the problem of acid rains has accompanied the rise of emission of these gases into the atmosphere.

SO2 is emitted from three principal man-made sources:

  1. Combustion of coal produces about 60% of total SO2 emitted into atmosphere.

  2. Combustion of petroleum products which adds 30% of total emission.

  3. Industrial activities like smelting of iron, zinc, nickel, copper ores, manufacture of sulphuric acid and operation of acid concentrators in petroleum industry. These produce the remaining 10% of this gas.

Overall emission of oxides of nitrogen is small in comparison with SO2, their importance in formation of acid rains is very high. Most of the oxides of nitrogen (NO3, NO2, NO etc.) are produced from:

  1. Combustion of fossil fuels.

  2. Industrial chimneys and thermal power stations.

  3. Motor vehicles in urban areas.

Man-made sources of SO2 and NOx emission are point sources (e.g. thermal power stations and industrial chimneys) and the emission from these occurs as a plume of gases. The plume of gases emitted from high stacks usually travels downwind for about 12 km as a straight line without much dispersion. Afterwards, its shape evolves by diffusion and changes progressively downwind into a widening cone. The direction, speed, distance of travel of the plume and its dispersal and diffusion depend upon meteorological conditions such as direction, velocity and pattern of propelling wind, air temperature (especially the vertical temperature gradient), air turbulence and atmospheric stability. Under stable atmospheric conditions, for example, at night over land and during day over snow covered ground, there is very little vertical dispersal for very long distance and the acidification may occur at quite far away place from the source of emission.

Dispersal of the plume of SO2 and NOx occurs in the mixing layer of atmosphere that extends from ground level upto 1-2 km altitude. The dispersal is triggered by diffusion and atmospheric turbulence, normally between 5 to 25 km from the point of source. The rate of diffusion and mixing of oxides into air is faster when flow of air is turbulent. The lower portion of the dispersing cone of oxide plume first touches the ground level at about 5 km distance form the point source while middle and upper portions are thoroughly dispersed in the air leading to dilution and chemical transformation.

The deposition of pollutant oxides from the plume onto the ground is of two types: dry deposition and wet deposition.

  1. Dry deposition: The acidic oxides deposited from the bottom of the plume between 5-25 km from the source in the form of gases and particles constitute the dry deposition. Though such deposition is not acid rain in strict sense, it produces acidification of soils and surface water bodies similar to acid rain. This dry deposition also causes direct SO2 and NOx poisoning of the vegetation. Dry deposition of sulphur and nitrogen oxides and undissolved acids on lakes and steams straightaway dissolve in the water and acidify the water bodies. Such dry deposition on land and on vegetation remains inactive till dew or rainfall when these dry deposited acids dissolve in the dew or rain water and form active acids. Such sudden addition of high concentration of acids into an otherwise stable environment causes acid shocks, acid flushes or acid surges. These terms indicate increasing levels of acidification and decreasing time period in which such acidification takes place. During winters, SO2 and NOx pollutants are dry-deposited on snow and ice in the catchment areas of many lakes and rivers. In the following spring season, when this snow and ice melt, the acids accumulated in the snow and ice over long period are suddenly released over a period of few days to a week causing acid surges in the lakes and streams.

  2. Wet deposition: It is the deposition of acidic oxides of the plume over land or vegetation after being dissolved in the rainwater, snow or ice forming acid rains, acid snow, acid mist or acid fog. Today’s industrial chimneys are normally 100-300 meters high and, therefore, such wet deposition normally occurs beyond 25 km from the point source. The prevailing wind pattern and the length of time over which oxides are transported in the wind system is of great importance in the geographical distribution of acid rains. Longer the SO2 and NOx remain in the atmosphere, greater is the possibility of their transformation to produce sulphuric and nitric acids.

The practice of increasing the height of chimneys and installation of electrostatic precipitators to reduce the air pollution appears to have magnified the problem of acid deposition in two ways. Firstly, tall stacks of pollutant-emitting units now emit pollutant gases at much greater heights so that these gases are now dispersed over much wider areas increasing the geographical extent of acid deposition. Secondly, installation of electrostatic precipitators and other mechanisms to remove alkaline particulates in chimneys has resulted in increased emission of acidic gases. It is because prior to installation of such mechanisms, acidic gases were neutralized to a large extent by alkaline particulates being emitted alongwith them.

CHEMISTRY OF ACID RAINS

Strictly speaking acid rain is a term which indicates a wide variety of mixtures of acids and oxides in the rainwater. For example, rainwater of pH 4.5 may contain a high sulphur content, high nitrogen content or any combination of the two. Acidity of rainwater results from chemical transformations of a large number of acidic ions added to the atmosphere from natural sources (e.g. sea salts, volcanic emissions, biogenic emissions, soil etc.) and by human. Major such ions can be categorized as following:

  1. Inorganic ions: These include trace metal ions which often act as catalysts to quicken the acidity processes. At coastal sites, corrections for the impact of seawater on rainwater quality have to made before accurate assessment of the role of land-based sources can be made. In individual locations, rainwater quality may be strongly influenced by local sources.

  2. Organic ions: These are important alongwith local biogenic sources in affecting the precipitation quality, particularly in tropics.

Table 1. Major inorganic and organic ions and molecules affecting rainwater acidity.

Ion or molecule

General source

Comments

INORGANIC IONS

 

H+ (cation)

 

SO42- (anion)

 

NO3- (anion)

 

Cl- (anion)

NH4+ (cation)

 

Ca2+ (cation)

 

K+ (cation)

 

Mg2+ (cation)

 

Na+ (cation)

 

INORGANIC CATALYSTS

 

H2O2 (molecule)

O3 (molecule)

Fe3+ (cation)

Mn2+ (cation)

NO2 (molecule)

 

 

Aqueous chemistry

 

Combustion of fossil fuels, ocean and soil processes

Agriculture, fossil-fuel burning

 

Ocean, some industries

Agriculture, decay processes, industry

Soil, agriculture

 

Soil, agriculture

 

Ocean, soil, agriculture

 

Ocean, industry

 

 

 

Aqueous chemistry

Atmospheric chemistry

Soil, industry

Industry

Fossil-fuel burning

 

 

Amount directly proportional to rainwater acidity

Strong acid, gas and liquid reactions

Strong acid, gas and liquid reactions

Acid, mainly gas reaction

Neutralization of anions

 

With carbonates, act as buffer acidity

With carbonates, act as buffer acidity

With carbonates, act as buffer acidity

With carbonates, act as buffer acidity

 

 

Major at all rainwater pH

Minor

Minor

Minor

Minor

ORGANIC MOLECULES

 

HCOOH (molecule)

CH3COOH (molecule)

 

Vegetation

Vegetation

 

Weak acid

Weak acid

 

The steps involved in each chemical process contributing to rainwater acidity depict a multitude of pathways with many of the steps being reversible and many of the steps exhibiting highly complex chemistry. Thus the overall chemistry of acid rain is extremely complicated because of the very large number of chemical interactions involved. Moreover, exact chemical composition of acid rain is not same in every area. It varies from place to place depending upon the proportion of different oxides present and the chemical transformations they have undergone during their stay in the atmosphere. Although a variety of natural and man-made oxides contribute to rainwater acidity through variety of chemical pathways, most important pathways are those associated with two major acidic gases i.e. SO2 and NO2 added to atmosphere from various polluting sources. The complex pattern of acid deposition has following six stages:

  1. The atmosphere receives SO2 and NOx from natural and man-made sources.

  2. Some of these oxides fall on the ground as dry deposition within 5-25 km from their parent sources.

  3. Formation of photo-oxidants like ozone, is stimulated in the atmosphere.

  4. The photo-oxidants interact with SO2 and NOx to produce acids (H2SO4 and HNO3) by oxidation.

  5. The oxides of sulphur and nitrogen, photo-oxidants and other gases (including NH3) dissolve in the cloud and rain-droplets to produce acids (H+ and NH4+) and sulphates (SO42-) and nitrates (NO3-).

  6. Acid rain containing ions of sulphate, nitrate ammonium and hydrogen falls as wet deposition.

The most important step in this chain of reactions is the catalytic conversion of SO2 and NOx. This may take from a few hours to a few days in the atmosphere and can not occur without photo-oxidants (precurssors). Ozone is the most readily available and abundant photo-oxidant in the atmosphere . Hydrocarbons and NO added to the atmosphere as pollutants are the two main precurssors of ozone. The acid rain is the final product of the loading of SO2 and NOx coupled with photochemistry and physical dynamics of stratosphere.

Acid gases like SO2 and NOx are transformed into dilute acids in the rainwater by following three major types of reactions:

  1. Homogeneous gas-phase reactions: These reactions occur in the dry atmosphere associated with photolytic oxidation processes.

  2. Homogeneous aqueous-phase reactions: These occur between individual species in a liquid medium such as cloud or raindrop.

  3. Heterogeneous aqueous-phase reactions: These occur during adsorption of acid gases on solid surfaces and are extremely complex. These reactions probably assist in creating rainwater acidity but are not considered to be as important as other two types of reactions in the overall chemistry of acid rains.

The relative importance of any chemical process operating in the atmosphere depends strongly on the meteorological conditions such as the presence of clouds, relative humidity, intensity of solar radiation, temperature etc. Following two factors are crucial to the operation of each process:

  1. Time available to complete secondary chemical reactions.

  2. Availability of excited ions and catalysts to assist the reactions.

Homogeneous gas-phase chemistry

In dry atmosphere, most of the acid gas reactions leading to formation of acid ions such as sulphates and nitrates involve excited molecules, atoms, free radicals and sunlight. The OH radical is particularly important in such reactions. Following main such chemical pathways lead to eventual formation of sulphuric and nitric acids in rainwater:

  1. SULPHUR DIOXIDE

Very slow reaction:

2SO2 + O2 ——- 2SO3

Unstable compounds:

OH + SO2 + M —– HOSO2 + M

HOSO2 + O2 —- HO2 +SO3

(M = catalyst; often Fe3+ or Mn2+)

Very fast reaction:

SO3 + H2O — H2SO4

  1. NITROGEN DIOXIDE

Very slow reactions: ( ppb concentrations are reached in many days)

2NO + O2 2NO2

or,

HO2 + NO —– OH + NO2

2NO2 + H20 —— HNO3 + HONO

Factors affecting homogeneous gas-phase reactions

  1. Interfering substances: Oxidation of SO2 and NO2 in the atmosphere is relatively a slow process and there may be several substances causing interference along the way. For example, HOSO2, which is a very unstable substance, may react with CO, NO, water vapour, various hydrocarbons and other chemical species and block the reaction described above.

  2. Catalysts: The reactions between SO2 and NO2 with O2 in the dry atmosphere are considered to be so slow without catalysts that the eventual output of acid is very small. Reactions with the addition of catalysts and free radicals are the main sources of ions leading to acidity of rainwater.

  3. OH radical: Oxidation rates of SO2 and NOx in a cloud-free atmosphere are highly variable and strongly dependent on the concentration of OH radical. If concentration of OH radical is relatively high (on the order of 9×106 mol cm-3), oxidation of SO2 to SO42- is approximately 3.7 +/- 1.9 % per hour. Conversion of NO2 to HONO2 is much more rapid reaction; its rate being about 34 +/- 17% per hour. With lower OH concentrations, the conversion rate is reduced and SO2 converts at a rate of about 0.7% per hour or about 16.4% per day. NOx conversion is at much faster rate and the rates vary between 6.2% per hour and 100% per day. In winters, conversion rates are 0.12% and 1.1% per hour respectively. At night, when OH concentrations are at minimum, conversion rates are sharply reduced.

Homogeneous aqueous-phase reactions

The species of sulphur and nitrogen can be incorporated in liquid water droplets in several ways e.g. (I) they may have high solubility in water; (ii) they may attach through diffusional processes; (iii) they may be incorporated through impactations and collisions and (iv) acid aerosol species may act as nuclei for formation of water droplets. Most important aqueous –phase reactions in acid-rain chemistry are as following:

A. SULPHUR DIOXIDE

SO2 + H2O <—- SO2.H2O

SO2.H2O H+ + HSO3-

HSO3- ——— H+ + SO3-

O2 + 2HSO3- ——- 2H+ + 2SO42- (Reaction slow without catalyst)

H2O2 + HSO3- ——– H+ + SO42- + H2O (Reaction is rapid)

O3 + HSO3- —— H+ + SO42- + O2 (Reaction is rapid if pH>4.5)

B. NITROGEN DIOXIDE

NO2 + O3 —– O2 + NO3

NO3 + NO2 + M <—— N2O5 + M (M = Catalyst; often Fe3+ or Mn2+)

N2O5 + H2O ——- 2H+ + NO3 + NO2

Factors affecting homogeneous aqueous-phase reactions

  1. Reaction medium: Conversion of acid ions is much faster when reaction medium is water. At the droplet scale, sequence of conversions might be:

    1. Initial diffusion of gas to the droplet interface.

    2. Transfer across the interface into the droplet.

    3. Swift aqueous-phase equilibrium.

    4. Aqueous-phase reactions and concurrent diffusion.

  2. Catalysts: In liquid water, catalysts are very important in determining the speed of conversion process. Models using proper chemical conversion estimates indicate that, with the exception of H2O2, impact of other catalysts is highly dependent on the pH level in the water. If pH of the droplet is of the order of 5.0, then conversion rates are significantly increased in the presence of O3, Fe3+, Mn2+ and other ions. However, at pH level of 4.5, trace metal ions contribute only about 1% per hour to the conversion process and the impact of ozone drops to about 10% per hour. At pH level of 4.0, trace metal ions have negligible impact and ozone adds only about 1% per hour to conversion process. This occurs because, in part, solubility of SO2 in water decreases with increasing H+ concentration.

  3. Hydrogen peroxide: It enhances the rate of conversion of SO2 to SO42- independently of the pH level in water droplets. H2O2 dominates the aqueous chemistry process and may increase the conversion rates to 100% per hour depending upon the cloud type, altitude and other meteorological conditions until it is fully exhausted. Afterwards, ozone becomes the dominant catalyst of conversion reactions. H2O2 is not important in the formation of NO3-. Favourable conditions for the formation of H2O2 are low NOx concentrations and high concentrations of hydrocarbons and aldehydes in the atmosphere. The conditions favourable for ozone formation are unfavourable for H2O2 formation.

  4. Cations in solution: The rates of formation of SO42- and NO3- may be altered by cations in solutions, particularly by ammonium (NH4+). The cations may increase the rate of oxidation of SO2 by more than an order of magnitude. Ammonia can dissolve as a gas in water droplets and thus directly reduce the rainwater acidity. Presence of extra cations enhances the impact of catalysts, especially at pH above 4.5. This results in formation of disproportionately high amounts of SO42- and NO3- in presence of cations in solutions than in presence of free H+. Ammonium seems to increase the formation of SO42- most in spring when concentrations of both NH4+ and H+ are highest. It has been suggested that about 50% increase in NH4+ in Europe since 1950s may have had some impact on the change in SO42- in rainwater relative to H+. If soil dust rich in cations like Ca2+ and Mg2+ is loaded into the atmosphere, these cations neutralize the strong acids and the rainwater tends towards alkalinity. For example, in India, strong acidic ions in atmospheres around urban areas are heavily neutralized by such soil dust.

  5. Formation of NO3-: In areas where concentrations of hydrogen peroxide and ozone are negligible, formation of NO3- can control the production of sulphuric acid in atmosphere. The H2O2 is not important in the formation of NO3-. Though very little is known about conversion of NOx in aqueous environment, N2O5 is supposed to play important role and perhaps of NO3- is directly formed from it depending on the relative concentrations of NOx and NO3-. In the night, reaction of oxides of nitrogen with ozone can produce significant amounts of NO3- because of the absence of its photochemical destruction.

  6. Season and time of day: Season and time of the day have important impact on acidity of rainwater and cloud-water due to following important reasons:

  1. Difference in pollutants and ions: There are generally different mixtures of pollutants and ions available for acid conversion at different times of day and in different seasons.

  2. Difference in gas-phase reaction rates: In winter, available solar energy is weaker and, therefore, gas-phase chemical reactions are slower than in summer.

  3. Difference in concentrations of catalysts: In winters, oxidation in clouds generally decreases because concentrations of appropriate catalysts are lower than in summers. For example, levels of H2O2 may be about 16 times higher in summers (about 4.8 ppbv) than in winters (about 0.3 ppbv). This high H2O2 concentration in summers enhances the formation of SO42- in that season. At night, conversion of SO2 to SO42- may reach 10% per hour in good catalytic conditions such as low stratus clouds over water.

  4. Difference in photochemistry: The photochemical production and destruction of chemical species in atmosphere depends on the availability and intensity of solar radiation and, therefore, may affect their concentrations during day and night. For example, concentration of NO3- increases considerably at night when it is not being destroyed photochemical reactions.

  5. Types of clouds and precipitation: Mechanism of removal from the clouds may vary by the types of clouds and precipitation. In the clean background air of southern hemisphere, gas-phase and aqueous-phase reactions are almost equal in importance. However, in northern hemisphere, particularly in winter season, aqueous-phase reactions become dominant.

Chemistry of acid fog

More recently, measurements at sites in parts of Europe, California and eastern U.S.A. have shown that in most circumstances, acid fog and water in low clouds has a lower pH value than equivalent acidic rainwater. Average pH values of acid fog in areas of heavy air pollution are about 3.4 and range from 2.8 to over 5.0 On average, mean concentrations of H+ and acid ions are 3 to 7 times higher in fog-water than in equivalent rainwater. Acid fog-water also has higher concentration of anions and cations. There are following five main reasons for the above describe differences:

Fog being located nearer to the ground, is often exposed to higher pollutant concentrations for longer periods of time than the rainwater during below-cloud scavenging. This exposure allows more time for extensive aqueous-phase chemical processes to take place.

Smaller fog and mist particles saturate with gaseous pollutants more quickly than the larger raindrops, allowing greater aqueous ion production.

The smaller droplets in fog and mist have a greater combined surface area compared to raindrops. As a result, acid gas diffusion is enhanced and higher concentrations of the resultant ions are produced.

The fog remains in the air mass in which it is formed while precipitation is often associated with changing air masses in frontal situations when much of the gaseous and aerosol material in the atmosphere is removed.

Pollutant aerosols originating several hundred kilometers away often act as nuclei for fog or cloud droplets and enhance aqueous chemical processes. The size and number of water droplets formed and the resultant chemistry depend on the number of aerosol nuclei available in the cloud. Greater number of these generally produce smaller and more numerous fog droplets. Ion concentrations in mist tend to be lower than in fog because mist contains a lesser number of droplets and this limits the chemical reactions.

However, fog-water shows wide variations in ion concentrations between sites and events. In stable atmosphere, low altitude fog masses are more likely to interact with pollutant emissions near the surface e.g. NOx from automobiles. On the other hand, mountain fogs occurring in a well mixed atmosphere and at times, isolated from low-altitude pollutant emissions due to inversions, tend to be cleaner having pH values of 5.0 and above. On minor scale, dew from polluted atmosphere can also be acidic with free H+ comprising about 80% of acidity while species of sulphur and nitrogen may contribute about 60% and 30% respectively to the acidity. 

September 2, 2008

HYDROSPHERE OF EARTH

Filed under: Environment — gargpk @ 12:07 pm
Tags: ,

All the water in its various forms, present in all thecomponents of Earth’s environment together constitutes the hydro­sphere. Most of the water is present as liquid water on the Earth’s surface and some liquid water is present underground. Apart of total water is present as snow or ice on the Earth’s surface while a substantial part of water in Earth’s environment is also present as water vapor in the atmosphere. General fea­tures of various parts of the Earth’s hydrosphere are as given below:

1. Oceans: Major part of water is present in the oceans of the Earth. Average depth of oceans is about 3.7 kilometers and about 1300 million cubic kilometers water is present in oceans.

2. Ice sheets: Substantial quantity of water, about 24 million cubic kilometers, is present as solid in the ice sheets of Earth. About 90% of the volume of such water is found in Antarctica.

3. Groundwater: About 24 million cubic kilometer water is present under the ground surface at depths of upto two kilometers.

4. Lakes and rivers: On the land surface, approximately 0.18 million cubic kilometer water is present in lakes while about 0.002 million cubic kilometer water is found in rivers.

5. Atmospheric moisture: The amount of water present as water vapor in the atmosphere is about 0.013 million cubic kilometer.

6. Biological water: In addition to above categories, about 0.001 million cubic kilometer water is contained in the bodies of living organisms.

The Earth did not have any hydrosphere in the beginning. It is thought that hydrosphere emerged as the result of processes taking place in the lithosphere. These processes released a substantial quantity of water vapor and juvenile waters during the geological history of Earth. Further, the amounts of water present in oceans, as ice and in atmosphere have fluctuated with appearance and disappearance of major periods of glaciations on the Earth. Palaeogeographic data indicates that the level of oceans on Earth had declined by more than 100 meters during the age of greatest glaciations during Quaternary period. It is estimated that if ice sheets present on Earth today were to melt completely, the level of oceans of Earth would rise by about 66 meters.

Most important feature of global environment of Earth is the hydrological cycle which determines the distribution of water on Earth’s surface and in the atmosphere. The water is evaporated from surface of water bodies like oceans, lakes, rivers etc. as water vapor into atmosphere. It is also absorbed by plants from soil and lost as vapor to atmosphere through transpiration. The water vapor condenses in the atmosphere to form precipitation and thus water is returned from the atmosphere to the surface of Earth. Cyclic movement of water in different components of the global environment is termed hydrological cycle.

OCEAN-WATER
Major portion of earth’s surface is covered with oceans. The water body in the oceans absorbs a large amount of solar radia­tion and has far reaching impact on the heat balance of earth. The water in oceans moves up and down as well as from one place to other. These movements of oceanic water result in transfer of heat from one place to other and have fundamental influence on various components of water and energy balance of land and oceans. The distribution of water balance components has major role in creating and maintaining the climatic and weather conditions in different regions of earth. Therefore, a brief discussion of various aspects of ocean water, ocean currents and waves has been given below.

COMPOSITION OF SEA WATER

Sea water may be described as a brine i.e. the solution of dissolved salts which have accumulated over past periods of geological time from the inflow of runoff water from the land masses. On the land masses, the salts have been formed by the process of weathering of rocks in which weak acids corrode and dissolve the rocks forming various minerals. Due to evaporation of water from oceans, the concentration of salts in the sea water rises resulting in rise of salinity

The composition of sea water results in important properties which are important in understanding its role in Earth’s environment. One way to describe the composition of sea water is to state the principal ingredients that would be required to make an artificial brine approximately like sea water. These ingredi­ents are listed below:

Table-2: Ingradients in ocean water.

Salt

gm salt per 1000 gm water

Sodium chloride (NaCl)

23

Magnesium chloride (MgCl2)

5

Sodium sulfate (Na2SO4)

4

Calcium chloride (CaCl2)

1

Potassium chloride (KCl)

0.7

With other minor ingredients to total

34.5

Of the various elements combined in these salts, Chlorine alone makes up 55% by weight of all the dissolved matter and Sodium 31%. In addition to elements of above listed five salts, less abundant but important are Bromine, Carbon, Strontium, Boron, Silicon and Fluorine. At least some traces of half of the known elements can be found in sea water. Small amounts of all the gases of the atmosphere are also present in dissolved form in the sea water. Chief among these are Nitrogen, Oxygen, Carbon dioxide, hydrogen and argon.

SALINITY OF SEA WATER

Salinity is described as the proportion of dissolved salts to pure water. It is usually stated in units of parts per thousand by weight and is designated by a special symbol 0/00. The total figure 34.5 0/00 in the above table represents 3.45 percent. Salinity of sea water varies slightly from one place to other in the oceans. Where diluted by abundant rainfall, as in the equatorial oceans, the salinity may be between 34.5 and 35.0 0/00, whereas in the subtropical high-pressure belts, where extreme dryness prevails, the evaporation may increase the salin­ity of surface sea water upto 35.5 0/00.

DISSOLVED GASES

Most important gases dissolved in the oceanic water are oxygen and carbon dioxide. The quantity of oxygen dissolved in the ocean­ic water changes within wide boundaries depending on the tempera­ture, living activities and certain other factors. The concentra­tion of carbon dioxide dissolved in sea water also changes but such change is has negligible importance since the overall quan­tity of carbon dioxide dissolved in sea water is about sixty times more than its amount in atmosphere. Carbon dioxide in sea water is assimilated by autotrophic organisms during photosynthe­sis and enters the organic matter cycle. Part of such assimilated carbon dioxide returns back to ocean water by respiration and after death and decomposition of living organisms but a substan­tial part of such assimilated gas is deposited as carbonate sediments at the bottoms of oceans.

DENSITY OF WATER

The density of water is given in grams per cubic centimeter. The density of pure water is greatest at 4 degrees C. At this tempera­ture, one cubic centimeter of water weighs exactly one gram i.e. its density is 1.000. However, the density of sea water ranges from 1.027 to 1.028. Two factors determine the density of sea water: salinity and temperature. Density increases with salinity and with low temperature upto -2 degrees C.

Density of sea water is of prime importance in circulation of ocean waters because slight density differences causes water to move. Where density of sea water increases by lowering of temperature of evaporation at the surface, the water tends to sink displacing less dense water below it. Just like convection wind systems, such vertical movements of sea water are also described as convectional currents.

OCEAN CURRENTS

Surface winds and density differences are two most important factors in generating and controlling ocean currents. Another factor affecting ocean current is the configuration of ocean basins and coasts.

Virtually all of the important surface currents of the oceans are set in motion by prevailing winds. Energy of winds is transferred to sea water by the frictional drag of the air blowing over the water surface. The Coriolis force impels the water drift toward the right of its path of motion in Northern hemisphere and, therefore, the current at the water surface is in the direction approximately 45 degrees to the right of the wind direc­tion. Under the influence of winds, currents may tend to bank up the water close to the coast of a continent, in which case the force of gravity, tending to equalize the water level, will cause other currents to be set up.

Density differences in oceans arise from greater heating by insolation or greater cooling by radiation, in one place than another. Thus the surface water chilled in the arctic and polar seas sinks to the ocean floor and spreads equatorward displacing upward the warmer, less dense water. Density differences can also be set up due to salinity differences. A currents tends to flow from the area of low salinity to the area of higher salinity, but this flow is also deflected by Coriolis force through a right angle in Northern hemisphere so that the flow is actually paral­lel with the slope of density gradient between the two places.

Configuration of ocean basins and coasts also affects the ocean currents. Currents initially set up by winds impinge upon a coast and are locally deflected to a different path or are confined in straits or gulfs.

The combined action of wind and density differences sets up the global oceanic circulation system including not only horizontal motions but vertical upswelling and down-sinking motions also. Oceanic currents of a shallow surface water zone have strong climatic influence upon overlaying layer of atmosphere and, hence, have been briefly discussed below.

GENERALIZED SCHEME OF OCEAN CURRENTS

There are a number of defined and permanent oceanic currents involving different oceans at the global scale. They have important impact on the climatic conditions of different regions of earth. It is now well recognized that oceanic circulation involves the complex motions of water masses of different temperatures and salinity characteristics. Important such movements have been briefly described below. However, this account does not take into account the movements of water masses at different depths.

1. Most striking features of generalized oceanic currents are the gyrals. These are circular movements of sea water around the subtropical highs, centered about 25 to 30 degrees S.

2. Two equatorial currents marks the belt of trade winds. Whereas the trade winds blow to the southwest and northwest obliquely across the parallels of latitudes, the water movement of this current flows the parallels. Thus the currents are turnd at an angle of about 45 degrees with the prevailing surface winds, because of the deflective force of the earth’s rotation.

3. The equatorial countercurrent separates the north and south equatorial currents and flows in opposite direction to them. It is well developed in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans.

4. Along the west sides of the oceans in low latitudes, the equatorial currents turn poleward forming warm currents parallel­ing the coasts. Examples of such oceanic currents are Gulf Stream (Florida and Caribbean stream), Japan current (Kuroshio) and the Brazil current. These currents bring higher than average tempera­tures along the respective coasts.

5. The west-wind drift is the slow eastward movement of oceanic water over the zone of westerlies. It covers a broad belt between 35degrees and 45degrees in the Northern hemisphere and between 30-35degrees to 70-75 degrees in Southern hemisphere where open ocean exists in the higher latitudes.

6. The west-wind drift, upon approaching the east side of the ocean is deflected both south and north along the coast. This results in equatorward flow of cool current produced by upwelling of colder water from greater depths. The Humboldt current (Peru current) off the coast of Chile and Peru, Benguela current off the southwest African coast, California current off the west coast of U.S.A. and Canaries current off the Spanish and North African coast are such currents. These currents bring colder than average temperatures along the respective coasts.

7. The North Atlantic current is a relatively warm current formed in the northern eastern Atlantic Ocean due to poleward deflection of west-wind drift. The current spreads around the British Isles, into the North Sea and along the Norwegian coast bringing about warming effect in summers alongwith it. This effect is more pronounced in winters.

8. In the Northern hemisphere, where the polar sea is largely landlocked, cold water flows equatorward along the west side of the large straits connecting the Arctic oceans with the Atlantic basin. Three such cold currents are Kamchatka current flowing southward along the Kamchatka Peninsula and Kurile Islands, Labrador current moving south from the Baffin Bay area through Davis Strait to reach the coast of Newfoundland, Nova Scotia and New England.

9. In both north Atlantic and Pacific oceans, the Icelandic and Aleutian lows coincide in a very rough manner with two centers of counterclockwise circulation involving the cold arctic currents and the west-wind drifts.

10. The Antarctic region has a relatively simple current scheme. It consists of a single Antarctic circumpolar current moving clockwise around the Antarctic continent in latitudes 50 to 60 degrees S where the expanse of open ocean exists. well.

OCEAN WAVES

Almost all the waves in the oceans that can be seen and felt, are produced by wind. The energy of moving air is transferred to water wave motion and this can, in turn, be expended upon the coasts of the lands causing the landforms of erosion and deposition. Thus ocean waves have important role in global energetics and coastal environments. A brief description of the waves in deep water, their growth and decay is given below.

The ocean waves generated by wind belong to a type known as progressive oscillatory waves since wave form travels through the water and causes an oscillatory water motion. Following terms are used in description of waves:

  1. Wave height: It is the vertical distance between the trough and the crest of the wave and is usually measured in feet or meters.

  2. Wave length: It is the horizontal distance from trough to trough or crest to crest and is also stated in feet or meters.

  3. Wave velocity: It is the speed at which wave advances through water and is given in feet or meter per second or in knots (nautical miles per hour).

  4. Period: It is the time elapsed between successive passages of wave crests past a fixed point and is given in seconds.

In the progressive oscillatory wave a tiny particle, such as a drop of water or small floating object, completes one vertical circle, or orbit, with passage of each wave length. Particles move forward on the wave crest, backward in the wave trough. At the sea surface the orbit is of same diameter as the wave height, but dies out rapidly with depth.

In the long waves the water particles return to the same starting point at the completion of each orbit. Hence there is no net motion in the direction of the wind. Only the energy of the wave and its form are transmitted through the water. However, in case of steep, high waves the orbits are not perfect circles. The particle moves just a bit faster forward when on the crest than when it returns in the trough, so that at the end of each circuit the particle makes a slight advance. This produces a very slow surface drift in the direction in which waves are traveling. The rate of this drift is called mass transport velocity. Under favorable conditions, the flow may reach a velocity as high as two knots and will tend to raise the water level along a coast against which the waves are breaking. This motion is not the same as set up by wind friction.

Ocean waves are usually not simple parallel crests and troughs. Instead, they appear highly irregular in height and form because of the interference among several wave trains that are normally present. These trains are not only of different periods, but travel in slightly different directions, so as to intersect at many points. Where two wave crests intersect, the wave height is increased, forming a peak. Where two troughs intersect, the depression is accentuated.

Two forms are waves are usually recognized: wind waves and swell.

(a) Wind waves: These are waves that are being formed and active­ly maintained by the wind. These grow through two mechanisms:

(1) The direct push of wind upon the windward slope of wave drives it forward, just as with floating object.

(2) The skin drag of air flowing over the water surface exerts a pull in the direction of wave motion. Over the wave crest, where drag is strongest, the orbital movement is supplemented adding energy to the wave. In the trough, which is protected, drag is weaker, hence does not counteract the reverse orbital movement as strongly as it is assisted on the crests. This results in a steady increase in the wave height and wave length to some maximum point possible under given wind strength. The wind waves commonly reach speeds much faster than the winds that produce and sustain them. This condition is possible only through the mechanism of skin drag.

The maximum height to which wind waves can grow is controlled by three factors.

(i) Wind velocity: It is obviously a major factor since this determines the amount of energy that can be supplied to the wave.

(ii) Duration of wind: This determines whether or not the waves the opportunity to grow to maximum size.

(iii) Available expanse of water (fetch): This is important because the waves travel as they grow. If waves are developed in a very large body of water over a period of many hours, so that neither duration nor fetch are limiting factors, the maximum wave height varies as the square of the wind velocity i.e.

Wave height (ft.) = 0.026 x Wind velocity2 (knots)s

This would represent the greatest waves to be expected.

Wind duration is important in the early stages of wave growth. Under strong winds, say 30 knots, waves will continue to grow for more than 32 hours although most rapid growth will be in the first 15 hours. Fetch may be an important limiting factor in small bays and straits but has no appreciable effect for water expanses greater than 1000 kilometers across.

(b) Swell: These consist of wind waves that have left the region where they were formed and are gradually dying out in a region of calm or lesser winds. As waves continue to grow, they not only increase their speed but also become longer i.e. their wave length increases. When they have passed beyond the region of strong winds that formed them, waves are transformed into a swell, consisting of very long, low waves of simple form and parallel, even crests. For each time that the swell has traveled a distance in nautical miles equivalent to its length in feet, the swell looses one-third of its height. The energy is lost by friction from air resistance.

SEISMIC SEA WAVES

When sudden displacements of large earth masses occur on the ocean floor, a series of waves is sent out across the ocean. The cause may be slippage along a fault, a volcanic eruption or a large submarine landslide. The waves thus produced are called the seismic sea waves or tsunami (Japanese). These waves are enormous in length (100 to 200 km) and the height of the waves upon reach­ing the shore is observed to be as great as 50 meters in many cases or may even be upto 100 meters in rare instances. In the deep ocean, wave height is only a foot or two and because their length is much greater than the height, such waves may pass unnoticed by observes in a ship at sea. The period of such waves may be 10 to 30 minutes and the velocity of travel of the wave form may be 450 to 800 km per hour. Upon reaching the shallow water of a coastline, a seismic sea wave has the effect of caus­ing an unusual rise of water level. The low areas are inundated and the wind waves which are superimposed upon them are able to break upon much higher grounds than normal.

SEA ICE ICEBERGS AND ICE ISLANDS

Large area in high latitudes of Arctic and Antarctic regions is characterized by presence of ice in various forms over the oceans. Sea ice, pack ice, icebergs and ice islands are important such forms of ice in these regions.

Sea ice is formed by direct freezing of ocean water. It begins to form when the surface water is cooled to temperatures of about -20C and is limited in thickness to about 5 meters be­cause once the insulating layer of floating ice has been formed over the water, heat is supplied from the underlying water as rapidly as it is lost from upper surface. Surface zone of sea ice is composed of fresh water, the salt being excluded in the proc­ess of freezing.

Pack ice is the name given to the ice that completely covers the sea surface. Under the force of wind and currents, pack ice breaks up into individual patches which are termed ice floes. Narrow strips of open water between such floes are called leads. Where ice floes are forcibly brought together by winds, the ice margins buckle and turn upward into pressure ridges resembling walls or irregular hummocks.

The North Polar Sea, which is surrounded by land masses, is normally covered by pack ice throughout the year, although open leads are numerous in the summer. The relatively warmer North Atlantic drift maintains an ice-free zone off the northern coast of Norway. In Antarctica, a vast ocean bounds the sea ice zone on the equatorward margin. Because the ice floes can drift freely north into warmer waters, the Antarctic ice pack does not spread beyond about 600S latitude in the cold season. In March, close to the end of the warm season, the ice margin shrinks to a narrow zone bordering the Antarctic continent.

Icebergs and ice islands differ from sea ice in origin and thickness. Icebergs are formed by breaking off or calving of the blocks from a valley glacier or tongue of an ice cap. These may be several hundred meters in thickness. Icebergs are only slight­ly less dense than the sea water and so these float very low in the sea water, about 5/6th of the bulk lying below the water level. The ice in icebergs is fresh since it is formed of com­pacted and re-crystallized snow. In the Northern hemisphere, icebergs are derived mostly from glacier tongues of the Greenland icecap. They drift slowly south with Labrador and Greenland currents and may find their way into North Atlantic sea in the vicinity of Grand Banks of Newfoundland. Icebergs of Antarctic region are distinctly different from those of arctic region. Whereas those of arctic region are irregular in shape and , therefore, present rather peaked outlines above sea water, the Antarctic icebergs are commonly tabular in form with flat tops and steep cliff-like sides. This is because the tabular icebergs are parts of ice shelves, the great, floating plate-like exten­sions of the continental icecap. In dimensions, a large tabular iceberg of the Antarctic may be tens of kilometers broad and over 700 meters thick, with an ice wall rising 70-100 meters above sea level.

Ice islands of North Polar Sea are somewhat related to tabular icebergs of Antarctic in origin. These are huge plates of floating ice which may be 25 kilometers across and have an area of 300 to 400 square kilometers. The bordering ice cliff, 7 to 10 meters above sea level indicates an ice thickness of 70 meters or more. The few ice islands known are probably derived from a shelf of land-fast glacial ice attached to Ellesmere Island about 83degrees N latitude. The ice islands move slowly with the water drift of Polar Sea and a charting of their tracks reveals much about the circulation in that ocean.

August 12, 2008

FACTORS AFFECTING PLANT SENSTIVITY TO AIR POLLUTANTS

Filed under: Air pollution, Environment — gargpk @ 12:58 pm
Tags: ,

Pollutant

Factor

Sensitivity

Comment

C2H4 pollution

Tissue age

Epinasty in immature leaves. Other symptoms on oldest leaves first.

Tissues with high natural C2H4 are more sensitive.

C2H4 pollution

High temperature

Sensitivity increased

C2H4 pollution

Other pollutants

Effects inhibited by high levels of SO2 or CO2

Cl2 pollution

Bright sunshine

Sensitivity increased

Cl2 pollution

Tissue age

Little effect; in conifers, current year’s needles most sensitive

Immature leaves tolerant in some species.

Cl2 pollution

Wet leaves

No effect

Cl2 pollution

Drought

Sensitivity decreased

Cl2 pollution

Low temperature

Sensitivity decreased in pines

Symptoms take longer to develop.

Cl2 pollution

Plat age

Seedling less sensitive than oleder plants

HCl pollution

Tissue age

Young, fully expanded leaves most sensitive

Immature leaves tolerant.

HCl pollution

Plant age

Seedlings less sensitive than mature plants

Older plants become more tolerant.

HCl pollution

High relat. Humidity

Sensitivity increased

HCl pollution

Ca-deficit

Sensitivity decreased

Effect shown for Nasturtium. May be different for other species.

HCl pollution

Ca-excess

Sensitivity increased

Effect shown for Nasturtium. May be different for other species.

HCl pollution

Cl-deficit

Sensitivity increased

Effect shown for Nasturtium. May be different for other species.

HCl pollution

Cl-excess

Sensitivity increased

Effect shown for Nasturtium. May be different for other species.

HCl pollution

Mg-deficit

Sensitivity increased

NH3 pollution

Concentration

Variable

Some conifers sensitive at moderate but tolerant at high levels.

NH3 pollution

Tissue age

Little effect

NH3 pollution

Darkness

Variable

NH3 pollution

Drought

Sensitivity decreased

NH3 pollution

Wet leaves

Sensitivity increased

Symptoms develop faster.

NOx pollution

Ca-excess

Sensitivity decreased

Opposite effect in some species.

NOx pollution

Tissue age

Immature leaves/needles most sensitive

NOx pollution

Cultivar

Highly variable; especially in gladiolus & tomato

In gladiolus, sensitivity related to flower colour

NOx pollution

High relat. humidity

Sensitivity increased

NOx pollution

Low temperature

Sensitivity decreased; symptom expression delayed

NOx pollution

Drought

Sensitivity decreased; symptoms induced in conifers needles previously exposed.

Sensitivity increased in some fruit trees.

NOx pollution

N-deficit

Sensitivity decreased

Opposite effect in some species.

NOx pollution

Ca-deficit

Sensitivity decreased

Opposite effect in some species.

NOx pollution

N-excess

Sensitivity decreased

Opposite effect in some species.

NOx pollution

P-excess

Sensitivity increased

Opposite effect in some species.

NOx pollution

Other pollutants

Interaction with SO2, NO2, O2 & hydrocarbons

Response varies with concentrations and relative proportions.

NOx pollution

K-deficit

Sensitivity increased

Opposite effect in some species.

O3 pollution

K-excess

Variable sensitivity

O3 pollution

N-excess

Variable sensitivity

O3 pollution

Plant age

Young plants most sensitive

O3 pollution

Tissue age

Intermediate leaves usually most sensitive

O3 pollution

Darkness

Sensitivity decreased

Plants grown in low light are more sensitive. High light during exposure increases injury.

O3 pollution

Wet leaves

Variable sensitivity

O3 pollution

Drought

Sensitivity decreased

O3 pollution

Other pollutants

Interactions with SO2, NO2, PAN & heavy metals

Response varies with species, concentration & relative proportions

O3 pollution

High soil salinity

Sensitivity decreased

O3 pollution

High relat. Humidity

Sensitivity increased

O3 pollution

S-excess

Sensitivity decreased

O3 pollution

N-deficit

Variable sensitivity

O3 pollution

P-deficit

Sensitivity decreased

O3 pollution

Low temperature

Sensitivity decreased

Sensitivity decreases again above 30 degree C. Response varies according to dose.

O3 pollution

K-deficit

Variable sensitivity

PAN pollution

High relat. Humidity

No effect

PAN pollution

Tissue age

Young, rapidly expanding leaves most sensitive

Sensitivity strongly affected by physiological age, results in bands of damage.

PAN pollution

Other pollutants

Interactions with O3 & SO2

Response varies with concentrations & pollutant.

PAN pollution

Drought

Sensitivity decreased

PAN pollution

Time of day

Sensitivity more in morning than after noon

PAN pollution

Darkness

Injury eliminated. Sensitivity increases with increased light intensity

Presence of light before, during and after exposure must for injury to occur.

PAN pollution

Low temperature

Injury decreased

PAN pollution

Plant age

Young plants more sensitive

SO2 pollution

Other pollutant

Interaction with O3, NO2, HF

Response varies with concentrations and relative proportions.

SO2 pollution

Time of day

More sensitivity when sugar content low

In many plants in the morning.

SO2 pollution

High relat. Humidity

Sensitivity increased

SO2 pollution

Drought

Sensitivity decreased

SO2 pollution

High wind

Sensitivity increased

SO2 pollution

Wet leaves

Variable; may increase

SO2 pollution

Darkness

Sensitivity decreased

Some plants e.g. Potato not closing stomata at night may be unaffected.

SO2 pollution

Low temperature

Sensitivity decreased

Susceptibility to frost injury increased by SO2 exposure

SO2 pollution

Plant age

Seedlings more sensitive than older plants

SO2 pollution

Season

Grasses more sensitive in winter; conifers more in April/May than in July/August

Not vry important for very short exposures.

SO2 pollution

N-deficit

Sensitivity decreased

SO2 pollution

S-deficit

Sensitivity decreased

SO2 pollution

P-deficit

Sensitivity decreased

SO2 pollution

N-excess

Sensitivity decreased

SO2 pollution

K-deficit

Sensitivity increased

SO2 pollution

S-excess

Sensitivity increased

SO2 pollution

Tissue age

Most in young, fully expanded leaves

SO2 pollution

Ca-deficit

Sensitivity increased

HABITAT AND PLANT RESPONSE

Filed under: Environment, plants — gargpk @ 12:51 pm
Tags:

Cause

Common name

Botanical name

Plant part

Symptom

Cold area

Pea

Pisum sativum

Leaf

Bronzing

Cold area

Bean

Phaseolus vulgaris

Leaf

Bronzing

Cold area

Spinach

Spinacea oleracea

Leaf

Bronzing

Dry area

Pine

Pinus sp.

Needle

Tip burn; sharp boundaary between necrotic and healthy tissue

Dry area

Spruce

Picea sp.

Needle

Tip burn; sharp boundaary between necrotic and healthy tissue

Dry area

Fir

Abies sp.

Needle

Tip burn; sharp boundaary between necrotic and healthy tissue

Dry area

Aspen

Populus tremula

Leaf

Tip necrosis with sharp boundary

Dry area

Plum

Prunus domestica

Leaf

Marginal/interveinal necrosis, boundary chlorotic & diffuse

Dry area

Wych elm

Ulmus glabra

Leaf

Tip necrosis with sharp boundary

Dry area

Willow

Salix sp.

Leaf

Tip necrosis with sharp boundary

Dry area

Cherry

Prunus avium

Leaf

Marginal/interveinal necrosis, boundary chlorotic & diffuse

Dry area

Oak

Quercus rubur (Q. pedunculata)

Leaf

Interveinal brown/bronzed lesions

Dry area

Apple

Malus sylvestris

Fruit

Dark lesions

Dry area

Cherry

Prunus avium

Fruit

Brown/black depression at tip

Dry area

Pear

Pyrus communis

Fruit

Brown/black depression at tip

Dry area

Tomato

Lycopersicum esculentum

Fruit

Blossom end rot

Water logged area

Lucerne (alfalfa)

Medicago sativa

Leaf

White stipple

Hot area

Onion

Allium cepa

Leaf

Tip necrosis; white/grey stipple

Hot area

Horse chestnut

Aesculus hippocastanum

Leaf

Marginal necrosis

Hot area

Lettuce

Lectuca sativa

Leaf

Brown stipple of veins

Hot area

Lucerne (alfalfa)

Medicago sativa

Leaf

White stipple

Cold area

Lucerne (alfalfa)

Medicago sativa

Leaf

Necrotic stipple

Cold area

Potato

Solanum tuberosum

Leaf

Black discolouration; necrotic stipple

NUTRIENT DEFICIENCY SYMPTOMS IN PLANTS

Filed under: Environment, plants — gargpk @ 12:43 pm
Tags:

Cause

Common name

Botanical name

Plant part

Symptom

K-deficit

Pear

Pyrus communis

Leaf

Upward curling

K-deficit

Pea

Pisum sativum

Leaf

Brown stipple

K-deficit

Potato

Solanum tuberosum

Leaf

Bronzing of lower surface; marginal, later interveinal necrosis

K-deficit

Tomato

Lycopersicum esculentum

Leaf

Marginal, later interveinal necrosis

K-deficit

Lucerne (alfalfa)

Medicago sativa

Leaf

Marginal, later interveinal necrosis

P-deficit

Cabbage

Brassica oleracea var. capitata

Leaf

Red/purple discolouration

P-deficit

Lucerne (alfalfa)

Medicago sativa

Leaf

Red/purple discolouration

P-deficit

Potato

Solanum tuberosum

Leaf

Curling or rolling

S-deficit

Tomato

Lycopersicum esculentum

Leaf

Very pale new leaf; Bleached old leaf

Ca-deficit

Tulip

Tulipa gesneriana

Leaf

Necrosis

Ca-deficit

Tulip

Tulipa gesneriana

Plant

Wilting

Mg-deficit

Pear

Pyrus communis

Leaf

Black necrosis

Mg-deficit

Potato

Solanum tuberosum

Leaf

Brown stipple

Mg-deficit

Tomato

Lycopersicum esculentum

Leaf

Curling & brittleness

Mn-deficit

Oats

Avena sativa

Leaf

Grey discolouration

Mn-deficit

Wheat

Triticum vulgare

Leaf

White dashes

Mn-deficit

Wheat

Triticum vulgare

Plant

Pale floppy appearance

Mn-deficit

Barley

Hordeum vulgare

Plant

Pale floppy appearance

Mn-deficit

Barley

Hordeum vulgare

Leaf

White dashes

Zn-deficit

Lucerne (alfalfa)

Medicago sativa

Leaf

White stipple on lower & Bronzing of upper surface

Zn-deficit

Tomato

Lycopersicum esculentum

Leaf

Interveinal chlorosis, later necrosis

Mn-excess

Cauliflower

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis

Leaf

Brown/purple stipple

Mn-excess

Potato

Solanum tuberosum

Leaf/stem

Black stipple or streaks

MINIMUM EXPOSURE TO AIR POLLUTANTS FOR PLANT INJURY

Filed under: Environment — gargpk @ 9:28 am
Tags: ,
Plant name Pollutant
ppm hours tolerance
Alder HCl 6.00 4.00 Middle
Aster HCl 9.00 0.40 Low
Barley HCl 7.00 0.40 Very low
Bean HCl 4.00 0.40 Very low
Beech HCl 1000.00 1.00 Very high
Cherry HCl 9.00 4.00 High
Chrysanthemum HCl 9.00 3.00 High
Cornflower HCl 20.00 0.40 Middle
Cosmos HCl 9.00 0.40 Low
Douglas fir HCl 10.00 4.00 High
Marigold HCl 9.00 0.40 Low
Nasturtium HCl 9.00 0.40 Low
Norway maple HCl 7.00 4.00 High
Norway spruce HCl 19.00 4.00 Very high
Oak HCl 1000.00 1.00 Very high
Tomato HCl 5.00 2.00 Low
Tulip tree HCl 3.00 4.00 Low
Weymouth pine HCl 8.00 4.00 High
Zinnia HCl 9.00 0.40 Low
Annual poa NH3 12.00 4.00 Middle
Buckwheat NH3 16.60 4.00 Middle
Chickweed NH3 12.00 4.00 Middle
Dandelion NH3 12.00 4.00 Middle
Apple SO2 0.40 6.00 Middle
Aspen SO2 0.40 3.00 Middle
Barley SO2 1.30 1.00 Very low
Bean SO2 0.80 3.00 Low
Begonia SO2 0.30 1.00 Very low
Broad bean SO2 2.00 4.00 High
Broccoli SO2 0.30 4.00 Low
Buckwheat SO2 0.70 1.00 Very low
Cabbage SO2 1.00 4.00 Low
Chrysanthemum SO2 2.50 3.00 Very high
Cocksfoot SO2 3.10 6.00 Very high
Cucumber SO2 0.80 4.00 Low
Dandelion SO2 2.00 4.00 High
Douglas fir SO2 0.70 4.50 Middle
French marigold SO2 2.00 2.00 High
Geranium SO2 2.00 2.00 High
Ginkgo SO2 2.80 3.00 Very high
Gladiolus SO2 0.50 8.00 Middle
Iris SO2 0.50 8.00 Middle
Italian ryegrass SO2 1.90 6.00 High
Larch SO2 0.30 8.00 Low
Lettuce SO2 1.00 2.00 Low
Locust tree SO2 2.00 4.00 High
Lucerne SO2 0.10 4.00 Low
Lilac SO2 0.30 6.00 Middle
Tomato NH3 8.30 5.00 Low
White clover NH3 100.00 0.10 Middle
African marigold C2H4 0.01 20.00 Low
Cattleya orchid C2H4 0.00 24.00 Very low
Aspen O3 0.15 2.00 Low
Bean O3 0.06 8.00 Low
Begonia O3 0.13 3.00 Low
Bindweed O3 0.20 4.00 Low
Apple C2H4 0.01 48.00 Middle
Buckwheat C2H4 0.05 48.00 Middle
Carnation C2H4 0.10 6.00 Low
Chrysanthemum C2H4 1.00 9.00 High
Cucumber C2H4 100.00 6.00 Very high
Fat hen C2H4 0.05 48.00 Middle
Forsythia C2H4 0.70 20.00 High
Narcissus C2H4 0.40 1.00 Very low
Pepper C2H4 0.10 8.00 Low
Rose C2H4 10.00 24.00 Very high
Snapdragon C2H4 0.50 1.00 Very low
Strawberry C2H4 1.00 24.00 High
Sunflower C2H4 0.05 48.00 Middle
Tomato C2H4 1.00 24.00 Middle
Tulip C2H4 0.40 1.00 Very low
Norway maple SO2 2.50 3.00 High
Oats SO2 1.00 1.00 Low
Onion SO2 1.00 4.00 Low
Pea SO2 1.00 1.00 Low
Petunia SO2 2.00 4.00 High
Pine SO2 0.30 2.00 Low
Plantain SO2 0.80 6.00 Middle
Poplar SO2 2.00 4.00 High
Potato SO2 4.20 1.00 Middle
Radish SO2 0.50 1.00 Low
Red fescue SO2 1.20 6.00 Middle
Rose SO2 0.70 6.00 Middle
Rye SO2 0.70 3.00 Low
Ryegrass SO2 1.00 6.00 Low
Fat hen NH3 12.00 4.00 Middle
Lettuce NH3 2.00 24.00 Low
Ryegrass NH3 100.00 0.20 Middle
Smooth-stalk meadow grass NH3 12.00 4.00 Middle
Silver birch SO2 0.90 2.00 Low
Smooth-stalk meadow grass SO2 0.20 2.00 Low
Snapdragon SO2 4.00 2.00 High
Spruce SO2 3.00 6.00 Very high
Spinach SO2 1.00 4.00 Low
Sweet pea SO2 0.80 3.00 Low
Swiss chard SO2 1.00 1.00 Low
Timothy SO2 0.80 1.00 Low
Tomato SO2 0.50 4.00 Low
Turnip SO2 1.00 2.00 Low
Wheat SO2 0.80 1.00 Low
Annual poa HF 0.10 4.00 Low
Apple HF 0.40 4.50 Middle
Azalea HF 0.10 48.00 High
Bean HF 0.70 2.30 Middle
Buckwheat HF 0.70 2.30 Middle
Celery HF 0.10 48.00 High
Chickweed HF 0.10 4.00 Low
Corn HF 0.10 4.00 Low
Dandelion HF 0.10 4.00 Low
Dock HF 0.50 8.00 High
Fat hen HF 0.10 4.00 Low
Gladiolus HF 0.06 6.00 Very low
Iris HF 0.50 8.00 High
Lucerne HF 0.10 48.00 High
Nettle-leaved goosefoot HF 0.10 4.00 Low
Norway spruce HF 0.20 5.80 Low
Pine HF 0.07 4.00 Very low
Polygonum HF 0.50 8.00 High
Rose HF 0.50 8.00 High
Smoot-stalk meadow grass HF 0.10 4.00 Low
Sunflower HF 0.10 4.00 Low
Tomato HF 0.30 3.00 Low
Tulip HF 0.50 8.00 High
Azalea Nox 13.00 1.00 Middle
Awnless brome Nox 4.00 0.50 Very low
Bean Nox 6.00 2.00 Low
Beet Nox 30.00 1.00 High
Begonia Nox 16.00 0.50 Middle
Broccoli Nox 16.00 0.50 Middle
Buckwheat Nox 4.00 4.00 Low
Chrysanthemum Nox 4.00 0.50 Very low
Corn Nox 4.00 0.50 Very low
Cocksfoot Nox 4.70 6.00 Low
Cucumber Nox 6.00 2.00 Low
Erica heather Nox 1000.00 1.00 Very high
Sunflower NH3 3.00 4.00 Very low
Italian ryegrass Nox 4.70 6.00 Low
Lettuce Nox 30.00 1.00 High
Lucerne Nox 6.00 8.00 Low
Oats Nox 4.00 0.50 Very low
Pea Nox 6.00 4.00 Low
Plantain Nox 3.30 6.00 Low
Potato Nox 30.00 1.00 High
Radish Nox 4.00 0.50 Very low
Rape Nox 30.00 1.00 High
Rye Nox 30.00 1.00 High
Ryegrass Nox 4.70 6.00 Low
Red fescue Nox 4.70 6.00 Low
Smooth-stalk meadow grass Nox 4.70 6.00 Low
Spinach Nox 6.00 2.00 Low
Swiss chard Nox 1.00 1.00 Very low
Timothy Nox 4.70 6.00 Low
Tomato Nox 8.00 1.00 Low
Wheat Nox 5.00 0.50 Very low
Azalea Cl2 0.80 4.00 Low
Azalea Cl2 0.80 4.00 Middle
Bean Cl2 1.30 0.50 Low
Begonia Cl2 1.00 4.00 High
Buckwheat Cl2 0.50 1.00 Low
Carnation Cl2 0.50 4.00 Middle
Clover Cl2 35.00 2.00 Middle
Corn Cl2 0.10 4.00 Very low
Cucumber Cl2 0.50 4.00 Middle
Dahlia Cl2 0.50 4.00 Middle
Dandelion Cl2 0.50 4.00 Middle
Fat hen Cl2 1.00 4.00 High
Geranium Cl2 0.80 4.00 High
Lucerne Cl2 0.10 2.00 Very low
Maple Cl2 0.10 4.00 Very low
Nasturtium Cl2 0.50 4.00 Middle
Onion Cl2 0.80 4.00 High
Petunia Cl2 0.10 4.00 Very low
Pine Cl2 1.00 3.00 High
Polygonum Cl2 1.00 4.00 High
Radish Cl2 0.10 2.00 Very low
Rose Cl2 1.00 0.50 Low
Ryegrass Cl2 35.00 0.20 Middle
Squash Cl2 0.80 4.00 High
Sunflower Cl2 0.10 2.00 Very low
Tomato Cl2 0.50 4.00 Middle
Zinnia Cl2 0.10 4.00 Low
Buttercup O3 0.20 4.00 Low
Chrysanthemum O3 0.26 3.00 Low
Corn O3 0.10 2.00 Low
Corsican pine O3 0.25 4.00 Low
European larch O3 0.25 4.00 Low
Grape O3 0.40 4.00 Middle
Lettuce O3 0.15 2.00 Low
Lucerne O3 0.15 4.00 Low
Oats O3 0.10 2.00 Very low
Pea O3 0.10 2.00 Very low
Poplar O3 0.18 4.00 Low
Radish O3 0.08 2.00 Very low
Red clover O3 0.15 4.00 Low
Scots pine O3 0.25 8.00 Middle
Smooth-stalk meadow grass O3 0.10 17.50 Very high
Spinach O3 0.13 3.00 Low
Tobacco O3 0.05 5.00 Very low
Common vetch O3 0.20 4.00 Low
Weymouth pine O3 0.07 4.00 Very low
Wheat O3 0.23 3.00 Low
White clover O3 0.15 4.00 Low
Bean PAN 0.05 4.00 Low
Petunia PAN 0.01 8.00 Low
Tomato PAN 0.01 4.00 Low
Lettuce PAN 0.05 12.00 High
Small nettle PAN 0.05 35.00 Very high
Annual poa PAN 0.05 42.00 Very high
Phalaenopsis orchid C2H4 0.00 24.00 Very low

AIR POLLUTANTS AND PLANT RESPONSES

Filed under: Environment — gargpk @ 9:14 am
Tags: ,
Cause Common name Botanical name Plant part Symptom
Acid mist pollution Begonia Begonia sp. Leaf Necrotic spots on upper surface at point of contact
Swiss chard Beta vulgaris var. cicla Leaf Shot holing
Boron pollution Honeysuckle Lonicera periclymenum Leaf Brown marginal necrosis; interveinal necrosis; cupping & distortion
Norway maple Acer platanoides Leaf Brown marginal necrosis; interveinal necrosis;necrotic stipple; abscission
Silver maple Acer saccharinum Leaf Brown marginal necrosis, interveinal necrosis; cupping & distortion
Spiraea Spiraea sp. Leaf Abscission
Br2 pollution Bean Phaseolus vulgaris Leaf Marginal necrosis
Beech Fagus sylvatica Leaf Black spots, later whole leaf black/brown
Corn Zea mays Leaf Yellow tip, later necrotic
Dahlia Dahlia pinnata Leaf Brown discolouration; marginal necrosis
Fir Abies sp. Needle Red/brown discolouration, later grey/brown
Larch Larix decidua Needle Yellow/white tip
Pea Pisum sativum Leaf Marginal necrosis
Pea Pisum sativum Tendril Necrosis
Rose Rosa sp. Leaf Brown discolouration
Rye Secale cereale Leaf Yellow tip, later necrotic
C2H4 pollution Apple Malus sylvestris Flower Intumescence formation
Apple Malus sylvestris Bark Hypertrphy, especially around lenticels
Azalea Rhododendron sp. Flower Necrosis
Beet Beta vulgaris Old leaf Red/purple discolouration
Carnation Dianthus caryophyllus Flower Closing of flowers; ’sleepiness’
Cattleya orchid Cattleya sp. Sepal Drying/bleaching from tip to base
Cucumber Cucumis sativus Flower Conversion of male into female
Daffodil Narcissus pseudonarcissus Leaf Inwards roll, curl or twist
Hibiscus Hibiscus sp. Stem Hypertrophy of lenticels
Hyacinth Hyacinthus sp. Flower Delayed opening; abnormal colour
Hyacinth Hyacinthus sp. Leaf Inwards roll, curl or twist; abscission
Lettuce Lectuca sativa Young leaf Dark green colouration
Lilac Syringa vulgaris Bark Hypertrphy, especially around lenticels
Lily Lilium sp. Leaf Inwards roll, curl or twist; abscission
Marigold Tagetus sp. Stem Root induction
Pea Pisum sativum Young leaf Dark green colouration
Petunia Petunia hybrida Flower Flowering inhibition
Phalaenopsis orchid Phalaenopsis sp. Sepal Drying/bleaching from tip to base
Poplar Populus sp. Bark Hypertrphy, especially around lenticels
Radish Raphanus sativus Old leaf Red/purple discolouration
Radish Raphanus sativus Young leaf Dark green colouration
Rose Rosa sp. Flower Premature opening
Rose Rosa sp. Old leaf Chlorosis, later necrosis
Rose Rosa sp. Young leaf Dark green colouration
Snapdragon Antirrhinum majas Flower Loss of petals
Tomato Lycopersicum esculentum Stem Root induction
Tulip Tulipa gesneriana Leaf Inwards roll, curl or twist; abscission
Tulip Tulipa gesneriana New leaf Continued folding
Willow Salix sp. Bark Hypertrphy, especially around lenticels
Wych elm Ulmus glabra Bark Loss of bark
Cement pollution Bean Phaseolus vulgaris Leaf Margin rolling; interveinal necrosis; growth inhibition
Oats Avena sativa Leaf Yellow spots
Cl2 pollution Apple Malus sylvestris Leaf Abscission; marginal necrosis
Azalea Rhododendron sp. Leaf Necrotic margins
Barberry Berberis vulgaris Leaf Marginal cholrosis
Cherry Prunus avium Leaf Necrotic stipple; abscission
Chrysanthemum Chrysanthemum sp. Leaf Necrotic stipple
Dahlia Dahlia pinnata Leaf Black marginal discolouration
Dandelion Taraxacum officinale Leaf Red discolouration
Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Needle Necrosis
Fir Abies sp. Needle Red/brown necrosis; narrow band of necrotic stipple between necrotic and healthy tissue
Ginkgo Ginkgo biloba Leaf Necrotic stipple
Hibiscus Hibiscus sp. Leaf Marginal cholrosis
Horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum Leaf White stipple
Horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum Leaf Marginal necrosis
Larch Larix decidua Needle Chlorotic mottle
Lettuce Lectuca sativa Leaf Necrotic margins; bronzing of lower surface
Lucerne (alfalfa) Medicago sativa Leaf Necrotic margins
Oak Quercus rubur (Q. pedunculata) Leaf Necrotic stipple; bronzing
Onion Allium cepa Leaf Tip necrosis
Pear Pyrus communis Leaf Black necrosis
Peony Paeonia sp. Leaf Necrotic margins
Pine Pinus sp. Needle Dull grey/green, later necrotic; orange necrosis; chlorotic mottle; narrow band of necrotic stipple between necrotic and healthy tissue
Plum Prunus domestica Leaf Necrotic stipple; marginal necrosis
Rhododendron Rhododendron Leaf Dark stipple, more on upper surface
Rose Rosa sp. Leaf Dark stipple, more on upper surface
Spruce Picea sp. Needle Red/brown necrosis; narrow band of necrotic stipple between necrotic and healthy tissue
Squash Cucurbita Leaf Cupping
Sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus Leaf Marginal necrosis
Sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus Leaf Black necrosis
Tomato Lycopersicum esculentum Leaf Cupping; epinasty
Tulip Tulipa gesneriana Leaf Bleached lower surface
Wych elm Ulmus glabra Leaf Marginal necrosis
Yew Taxus baccata Needle Black necorsis
Fluoride pollution Apple Malus sylvestris Leaf Interveinal necrotic stipple; red/brown necrosis
Bilberry Vaccinium sp. Leaf Red tip & margin discolouration
Buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum Leaf Leaf cupping
Cherry Prunus avium Fruit Necrosis of stylar end
Colorado spruce Picea pungens Young needle Purple necrosis
Corn Zea mays Leaf Marginal chlorotic mottle; necrotic stipple, later necrotic streaks
Cyclamen Cyclamen Sepals & petals Marginal necrosis
Dahlia Dahlia pinnata Leaf Black necrosis
Dandelion Taraxacum officinale Leaf Ivory necrosis
Gladiolus Gladiolus sp. Leaf Glazed upper surface; red/brown necrosis
Lilac Syringa vulgaris Leaf Necrotic bands; red margin discolouration
Lucerne (alfalfa) Medicago sativa Leaf Marginal necrosis
Oats Avena sativa Leaf Ivory necrosis
Peach Prunus persica Fruit Premature ripening & suture rotting
Pear Pyrus communis Fruit Necrosis of stylar end
Petunia Petunia hybrida Sepals & petals Marginal necrosis
Pine Pinus sp. Young needle Reddish necrotic bands
Poplar Populus sp. Leaf Ivory necrosis; tip notching
St. Johns Wort Hypericum perforatum Leaf Red/brown necrosis
Sunflower Helianthus annuus Leaf Brown necrosis
Tomato Lycopersicum esculentum Leaf Edge curling; ivory necrosis
Tulip Tulipa gesneriana Leaf Glazed upper surface
Wheat Triticum vulgare Leaf Bleached tip; ivory necrosis
H2S pollution Aster Callistephus chinensis Flower Necrosis of bracts
Buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum Leaf Upward rolling
Sunflower Helianthus annuus Leaf Distortion; orange interveinal necrosis
HCl pollution Aspen Populus tremula Leaf Chlorotic mottle
Aster Callistephus chinensis Leaf Bronzing/glazing of lower surface
Bean Phaseolus vulgaris Leaf Ivory necrosis; bronzing/glazing of lower surface; upward curling or rolling
Beech Fagus sylvatica Leaf Interveinal bleaching; necrotic stipple
Cherry Prunus avium Leaf Chlorotic mottle
Cornflower Centaurea cyanus Leaf Necrotic stipple; upward curling or rolling
Cosmos Cosmos bipinnatus Sepal Tip burn
Cosmos Cosmos bipinnatus Leaf Upward curling or rolling
Cosmos Cosmos bipinnatus Petal Discolouration
Dahlia Dahlia pinnata Leaf Black marginal discolourationg; black necrosis
Maple Acer sp. Leaf Necrotic stipple
Marigold Tagetus sp. Sepal Tip burn
Nasturtium Tropeolum majas Leaf Necrotic stipple; bleaching
Oak Quercus rubur (Q. pedunculata) Leaf Interveinal bleaching
Pear Pyrus communis Leaf Marginal necrosis
Rose Rosa sp. Leaf Black marginal discolourationg; marginal necrosis
Silver birch Betula pendula Leaf Marginal necrosis
Tomato Lycopersicum esculentum Leaf Bronzing/glazing of lower surface; bifacial bronzing, later necrotic
Zinnia Zinnia angustifolia Leaf Bronzing/glazing of lower surface; upward curling or rolling
Zinnia Zinnia angustifolia Petal Necrotic stipple
Hg pollution Privet Ligustrum sp. Leaf Browning of interveinal tissue
Rose Rosa sp. Petal Colour loss, later brown at margins
Rose Rosa sp. Stamen/pistil Black
Rose Rosa sp. Bud Remain closed, later necrosis
Rose Rosa sp. Peduncle Brown/black
Rose Rosa sp. Flower Abscission
NH3 pollution Apple Malus sylvestris Fruit Purple/black/brown discolouration around lenticels
Azalea Rhododendron sp. Leaf Brown/black necrosis
Azalea Rhododendron sp. Flower Brown & white marks on white and red flowers respectively
Barley Hordeum vulgare Leaf Bleaching
Bean Phaseolus vulgaris Leaf Red discolouration; red/brown/purple margins of necrotic areas
Beech Fagus sylvatica Leaf Bronzing/glazing of upper surface
Broad bean Vicia faba Leaf Yellow discolouration; later black
Buttercup Ranunculus sp. Leaf Yellow discolouration; later black
Carrot Daucus carota Leaf Brown/black necrosis
Cauliflower Brassica oleracea var. botrytis Leaf Ivory necrosis; black spots on lower surface
Celery Apium graveolens Leaf Red discolouration
Clover Trifol